Michigan employees are protected from workplace harassment in both the private and public sectors through federal and state antidiscrimination statutes. Michigan’s Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act and the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act both recognize workplace harassment as a form employment discrimination. Michigan’s Elliott-Larsen’s Act protects against discrimination for religion, race, color, national origin, age, sex, height, weight, or marital status, while Title VII protects against discrimination based on race, sex, color, or national origin. The Supreme Court has also held that Title VII prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity, and transgender status.
It is well-understood that when an employee complains of harassment by a supervisor, the employer may be vicariously liable for a hostile work environment, and an investigation, therefore, should follow. But where the harassment is committed by a coworker, the employer is liable only if it knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to implement prompt and appropriate corrective action. Regardless of the differing standards, when employees claim they are being harassed by a coworker, employers should investigate them as promptly and seriously as claims of harassment by a supervisor.
In a recent 6th Circuit Court of Appeals case, Jane Doe v. City of Detroit, Case No. 20-2029 (July 9, 2021), the plaintiff employee underwent gender reassignment surgery while employed by the City of Detroit then made claims of harassment by an unknown perpetrator. The case illustrates the importance of addressing employee’s claims of harassment as soon as possible. Not only it is important in order to make the workplace safe for all employees, the employers’ response will make or break a finding on liability of the employer.
The most significant immediate measure an employer can take in response to a sexual harassment complaint is to launch a prompt investigation to determine whether the complaint is justified. By doing so, the employer puts all employees on notice that it takes such allegations seriously and will not tolerate harassment in the workplace. To find liability, the employer’s response to a coworker’s harassment must “manifest indifference or unreasonableness in light of the facts the employer knew or should have known.” The appropriate corrective response will vary according to the severity and persistence of the alleged harassment.
Steps that establish a base level of reasonably appropriate responsive action may include:
Employers that take the above steps put themselves in a favorable position should a dispute later arise about their response to a complaint of harassment—by a supervisor, coworker, or anyone else.
 Collette v. Stein-Mart, Inc. 126 F. App’x 678, 686 (6th Cir. 2005).
 Waldo v. Consumers Energy Co., 726 F. 3d 802, 814 (6th Cir. 2013)
The business and employment attorneys of Dalton & Tomich take your business just as seriously as you do. Attorneys Zana Tomich and Noel Sterett are trusted by closely held family businesses and others across Michigan and Northern Illinois as invaluable partners and counselors. We guarantee all your calls and emails will be returned within one business day so you can focus on what you do best: running your business.
Having worked with Zana for 10 years, I can attest to her professionalism, her pragmatism, and most importantly, her integrity. I always get sound, thoughtful advice and guidance. From routine filings & updates to the highly unexpected, Zana’s there to help, always responding quickly and […]Read More
We highly recommend Dalton & Tomich! As a start-up firm that has rapidly grown across the country in under 5 years, Dalton & Tomich has been integral to our sound, credible, and excellent in standard infrastructure. As we’ve scaled, Zana has been right by our […]Read More
As a professional photographer in the wedding industry, reliable communication is very important to me. Noel was very knowledgeable and quick to respond to all of my questions and not just that, he also gave me suggestions when reviewing and updating my contract. The entire […]Read More
Zana’s expert guidance has helped us to move forward with clarity and confidence in our business endeavors. She helped us create a new business entity, and a few years later to navigate a tricky buyout—all with a clear path forward for business growth. Her calm […]Read More
Noel’s guidance was much appreciated when redrafting my client contract. He was very professional, respectful of my time and potential costs, and was sincere with his advice. I trusted that he had the highest good for my business in mind. I will seek out his […]Read More
Zana’s expertise in employee law has helped us refine and build a stronger operations and hiring strategy at my company. As a business owner of a small and fast growing company, I very much appreciate Zana’s ability to always step into any situation quickly and […]Read More